tag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:/activityIcinga on UserVoice2012-05-10T00:33:37-07:00tag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113222382012-05-10T00:33:37-07:002012-05-10T00:33:37-07:00Add recurring downtimes [updated]<p>Downtimes on a regular basis; compare: maintenance_downtime in shinken; compare: Plugin used in Nagios: downtime_sched by Steve Shipway</p><p>Ch. Hager said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>Great! Gonna give it a try as soon as possible. Tanks.</p></div></p>Ch. Hagertag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188782012-05-09T11:30:18-07:002012-05-09T11:30:18-07:00Statusmap with Export Function [is now planned]<p>I love the Statusmap of new Icinga Web. But there is a extension that would be really great.
In our IT Department we print the Statusmap and put it on the wall for meetings.
So untill now i used Nagvis and made a screenshot put it into an image, changing the descriptions and so on.
This is a lot of work i have to do every month.
It would be a lot easier if i could click on an Button and i could download a whole Statusmap of the new Icinga Web (png,jpg,pdf or whatever).</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188772012-05-09T11:30:18-07:002012-05-09T11:30:18-07:00Statusmap with Export Function [updated]<p>I love the Statusmap of new Icinga Web. But there is a extension that would be really great.
In our IT Department we print the Statusmap and put it on the wall for meetings.
So untill now i used Nagvis and made a screenshot put it into an image, changing the descriptions and so on.
This is a lot of work i have to do every month.
It would be a lot easier if i could click on an Button and i could download a whole Statusmap of the new Icinga Web (png,jpg,pdf or whatever).</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>see <a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2596" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2596</a></p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188622012-05-09T11:28:38-07:002012-05-09T11:28:38-07:00The feedback tab gets in the way of comments. [is now declined]<p>Move it. Like, to the right. Or just remove it.</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188612012-05-09T11:28:38-07:002012-05-09T11:28:38-07:00The feedback tab gets in the way of comments. [updated]<p>Move it. Like, to the right. Or just remove it.</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>we won't change that. sorry for the hassle.</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188562012-05-09T11:27:49-07:002012-05-09T11:27:49-07:00just ran into this [is now under review]<p>I just hit this bug as well. It exists. Don't hate. very bizarre behaviour. </p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188552012-05-09T11:27:49-07:002012-05-09T11:27:49-07:00just ran into this [updated]<p>I just hit this bug as well. It exists. Don't hate. very bizarre behaviour. </p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>ehm what exactly to you mean?</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188482012-05-09T11:26:57-07:002012-05-09T11:26:57-07:00add hosts [is now under review]<p>Auto detect and add hosts</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188472012-05-09T11:26:57-07:002012-05-09T11:26:57-07:00add hosts [updated]<p>Auto detect and add hosts</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>better to be called - a discovery module, automagically adding new hosts etc</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188182012-05-09T11:24:03-07:002012-05-09T11:24:03-07:00Make the Status Map use all available space in the Browserwindow [is now planned]<p>At the moment the Status Map seems to be using only 600 x 600 pixels on the screen. If you have a high resolution you could display more data.</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113188172012-05-09T11:24:02-07:002012-05-09T11:24:02-07:00Make the Status Map use all available space in the Browserwindow [updated]<p>At the moment the Status Map seems to be using only 600 x 600 pixels on the screen. If you have a high resolution you could display more data.</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>please comment here to extend demand and/or add proposals <a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2595" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2595</a></p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187752012-05-09T11:19:15-07:002012-05-09T11:19:15-07:00nginx [is now planned]<p>I'd like to hear that oneday you support Nginx.....</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187742012-05-09T11:19:15-07:002012-05-09T11:19:15-07:00nginx [updated]<p>I'd like to hear that oneday you support Nginx.....</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p><a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2253" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2253</a></p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187632012-05-09T11:18:31-07:002012-05-09T11:18:31-07:00Thaks for good piece of work! [is now completed]<p>Succesfully installed on debian</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187622012-05-09T11:18:31-07:002012-05-09T11:18:31-07:00Thaks for good piece of work! [updated]<p>Succesfully installed on debian</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>thanks to our debian packager formorer! :)</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187542012-05-09T11:17:50-07:002012-05-09T11:17:50-07:00icinga-web sould show 2 systems at the same time this means one on the left side and one on the othe [is now completed]<p>icinga-web should show more than the systems on the left side, while there are a lot of blank space on the middle side and on the right side. Our users must allways scroll to have a look of all systems.</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187532012-05-09T11:17:50-07:002012-05-09T11:17:50-07:00icinga-web sould show 2 systems at the same time this means one on the left side and one on the othe [updated]<p>icinga-web should show more than the systems on the left side, while there are a lot of blank space on the middle side and on the right side. Our users must allways scroll to have a look of all systems.</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>that's already possible with the 2 and 3colums cronks, plus you can hide all unwanted views (menue) plus search has been integrated on top, plus a fullscreen view is now also supported.</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187192012-05-09T11:13:50-07:002012-05-09T11:13:50-07:00Icinga Web Pocess Information [is now completed]<p>Icinga Web is missing the System->Process Information page which is available in the classic GUI. This is especially important if you would like to disable notifications and/or restart the Icinga process.</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113187182012-05-09T11:13:50-07:002012-05-09T11:13:50-07:00Icinga Web Pocess Information [updated]<p>Icinga Web is missing the System->Process Information page which is available in the classic GUI. This is especially important if you would like to disable notifications and/or restart the Icinga process.</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>check the 1.6 and newer releases with the instances cronk, where you can control all your instances. <a href="http://twitpic.com/9j6wa3/full" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://twitpic.com/9j6wa3/full</a></p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113186432012-05-09T11:05:56-07:002012-05-09T11:05:56-07:00icinga-web with multiple data sources [is now started]<p>icinga-web should handle more than one datasources, so you can have autonomic icinga installations and one webinterface for an overlook over them all.</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113186422012-05-09T11:05:56-07:002012-05-09T11:05:56-07:00icinga-web with multiple data sources [updated]<p>icinga-web should handle more than one datasources, so you can have autonomic icinga installations and one webinterface for an overlook over them all.</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>this has been started here <a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/892" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/892</a> and can be tested with the current git master. though, it needs a yet better integration.</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113186312012-05-09T11:04:04-07:002012-05-09T11:04:04-07:00Change Release Interval to 180 days [is now planned]<p>From my work with Icinga the release interval of 90 days is to fast. In a enterprise environment it is very difficult to update the installation all 90 days. Further I can also imagine that for the development team a higher interval rate could maybe make life a little bit easier.
If I remeber correctly I saw once a presentation from the Icinga Team with a roadmap where each second release should be a beta release. From documentation and each release I don't see that concept.
My suggestion would be a release interval of 180 days instead of 90 days. </p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113186302012-05-09T11:04:04-07:002012-05-09T11:04:04-07:00Change Release Interval to 180 days [updated]<p>From my work with Icinga the release interval of 90 days is to fast. In a enterprise environment it is very difficult to update the installation all 90 days. Further I can also imagine that for the development team a higher interval rate could maybe make life a little bit easier.
If I remeber correctly I saw once a presentation from the Icinga Team with a roadmap where each second release should be a beta release. From documentation and each release I don't see that concept.
My suggestion would be a release interval of 180 days instead of 90 days. </p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>this has happened with the reschedule of 1.7 making 1.8 the october release version. are 2 to 3 feature releases a better choice?</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113186082012-05-09T11:01:36-07:002012-05-09T11:01:36-07:00Add recurring downtimes [is now started]<p>Downtimes on a regular basis; compare: maintenance_downtime in shinken; compare: Plugin used in Nagios: downtime_sched by Steve Shipway</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/113186072012-05-09T11:01:36-07:002012-05-09T11:01:36-07:00Add recurring downtimes [updated]<p>Downtimes on a regular basis; compare: maintenance_downtime in shinken; compare: Plugin used in Nagios: downtime_sched by Steve Shipway</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>see <a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1867" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1867</a> for a first draft which will be available in icinga 1.7 to be tested (without gui support).</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/112921182012-05-04T23:46:08-07:002012-05-04T23:46:08-07:00just ran into this<p>Anonymous suggested:<br />I just hit this bug as well. It exists. Don't hate. very bizarre behaviour. </p>Anonymoustag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/111971542012-04-20T02:30:10-07:002012-04-20T02:30:10-07:00consider using mk_livestatus for icinga-web [updated]<p>I was really impressed by the speed and opportuninties of the mk_livestatus eventbroker module.
What do you think about using it for communication bewteen the new icinga-web an icinga-core?
</p><p>melle said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>Any news on this topic?</p></div></p>melletag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/106624282012-02-01T01:47:27-08:002012-02-01T01:47:27-08:00nginx [updated]<p>I'd like to hear that oneday you support Nginx.....</p><p>Ricardo said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>for now: <a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2253" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/2253</a></p></div></p>Ricardotag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/106556142012-01-31T04:08:07-08:002012-01-31T04:08:07-08:00Dependency for host and services.<p>Simon suggested:<br />It would be (REALLY) useful to have builtin dependencys into Icinga to get functionallity like http://bp-addon.monitoringexchange.org/ and an easy way to build up an dependency tree. Its a bit of a pain with BP and I would rather in my host and service configs specify dependency and let Icinga sort everything out by itself.</p>Simontag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/105850092012-01-19T07:30:19-08:002012-01-19T07:30:19-08:00The feedback tab gets in the way of comments. [updated]<p>Move it. Like, to the right. Or just remove it.</p><p>dnsmichi said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>Remove the feedback button? That proposal doesn't make any sense to me.</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/105466522012-01-12T16:59:11-08:002012-01-12T16:59:11-08:00add hosts<p>daniel suggested:<br />Auto detect and add hosts</p>danieltag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/104071892011-12-15T14:33:00-08:002011-12-15T14:33:00-08:00Change Release Interval to 180 days<p>Erich Schommarz suggested:<br />From my work with Icinga the release interval of 90 days is to fast. In a enterprise environment it is very difficult to update the installation all 90 days. Further I can also imagine that for the development team a higher interval rate could maybe make life a little bit easier.
If I remeber correctly I saw once a presentation from the Icinga Team with a roadmap where each second release should be a beta release. From documentation and each release I don't see that concept.
My suggestion would be a release interval of 180 days instead of 90 days. </p>Erich Schommarztag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/104042072011-12-15T05:32:30-08:002011-12-15T05:32:30-08:00icinga-web sould show 2 systems at the same time this means one on the left side and one on the othe [updated]<p>icinga-web should show more than the systems on the left side, while there are a lot of blank space on the middle side and on the right side. Our users must allways scroll to have a look of all systems.</p><p>Frankstar said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>what did u mean exactly ?</p></div></p>Frankstartag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/104041992011-12-15T05:30:43-08:002011-12-15T05:30:43-08:00Have SNMP support for traps by default [updated]<p>Frankstar said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>i think he means the integration without snmptt.</p></div></p>Frankstartag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/102967732011-11-25T10:58:37-08:002011-11-25T10:58:37-08:00Acknowledge with expire time [is now completed]<p>Setting a default (mandatory) expiration for acknowledgements would require NOC to actively work issues or be paged again. Currently system allows for acknowledged but unfixed problems to fester. </p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/102967722011-11-25T10:58:37-08:002011-11-25T10:58:37-08:00Acknowledge with expire time [updated]<p>Setting a default (mandatory) expiration for acknowledgements would require NOC to actively work issues or be paged again. Currently system allows for acknowledged but unfixed problems to fester. </p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p><a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/770" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/770</a></p>
<p>will hit 1.6.0 next week.</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/99788812011-10-08T21:26:19-07:002011-10-08T21:26:19-07:00An agent for Proxmox/Opennode<p>cloudbeans suggested:<br />Proxmox http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Main_Page
& OpenNode http://www.opennodecloud.com/ are bare-metal virtual environments</p>cloudbeanstag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/99234352011-09-30T15:18:15-07:002011-09-30T15:18:15-07:00Acknowledge with expire time [is now started]<p>Setting a default (mandatory) expiration for acknowledgements would require NOC to actively work issues or be paged again. Currently system allows for acknowledged but unfixed problems to fester. </p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/99234342011-09-30T15:18:15-07:002011-09-30T15:18:15-07:00Acknowledge with expire time [updated]<p>Setting a default (mandatory) expiration for acknowledgements would require NOC to actively work issues or be paged again. Currently system allows for acknowledged but unfixed problems to fester. </p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p><a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/770" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/770</a></p>
<p>git - test/core - help test :)</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/99233112011-09-30T15:00:30-07:002011-09-30T15:00:30-07:00Implement a system to ACK emailed notifications by email or SMS/email gateway [is now declined]Anonymoustag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/99233102011-09-30T15:00:29-07:002011-09-30T15:00:29-07:00Implement a system to ACK emailed notifications by email or SMS/email gateway [updated]<p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>since the guide remains now in the wiki, and it is from the discussion and analysis definitely a core addon, feel free to catch in and enhance this guide or create a better script/daemon yourself.</p>
<p><a href="https://wiki.icinga.org/display/howtos/Add+mailfilter+to+acknowledge+notification+mails+by+replying" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://wiki.icinga.org/display/howtos/Add+mailfilter+to+acknowledge+notification+mails+by+replying</a></p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/98121092011-09-19T00:50:56-07:002011-09-19T00:50:56-07:00implement way to pass acknowledges, downtimes to other hosts<p>Wilfried Klaebe suggested:<br />In a master/slave redundancy setup, I'd like to pass acknowledgements and downtimes to the other host automatically.</p>Wilfried Klaebetag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96590412011-08-28T23:45:55-07:002011-08-28T23:45:55-07:00API to add new hosts/groups/services/commands automagically. [updated]<p>Евгений Наумов said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>I suggest to think about classic interface with ability to create configuration entries (hosts, services,contacts and etc.). Classic UI have limited ability to configure Icinga. It would be great to extend it's functionality. I agree it should be some API in the Core. May be not "automatically"? but like in NagiosQL (add new entry, save config, refresh new config to daemon)</p></div></p>Евгений Наумовtag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96132792011-08-25T02:39:39-07:002011-08-25T02:39:39-07:00eMail Content configurable [is now completed]<p>You can configure how many Details are in the eMails. It Would be good to have Comments of Aknowledgments and more Status Details in the eMails.</p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96132772011-08-25T02:39:38-07:002011-08-25T02:39:38-07:00eMail Content configurable [updated]<p>You can configure how many Details are in the eMails. It Would be good to have Comments of Aknowledgments and more Status Details in the eMails.</p><p>dnsmichi (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p><a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1697" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1697</a>
<br />will be in 1.5.0 and give a first idea what's possible with macros. for further howtos you are welcome to write guides onto the icinga wiki or prose inclusion into upstream example configs.</p></div></p>dnsmichitag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96132472011-08-25T02:36:59-07:002011-08-25T02:36:59-07:00nginx [updated]<p>I'd like to hear that oneday you support Nginx.....</p><p>Bernd Erk said:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>Sounds like a good idea. What about helping us with that and provide an install guide in the wiki (wiki.icinga.org)?</p></div></p>Bernd Erktag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96132192011-08-25T02:33:04-07:002011-08-25T02:33:04-07:00Allow a filter in "open problems" for "NOT acknowledged AND NOT in downtime" [is now completed]<p>To much problems in the "open problems" overview, planed downtime is displayed as alarm. I always try to resolve problems until they fit onto the display without scrolling to recognize new problems as fast as possible. Because of that I'm still using Icinga Classic Interface.</p>Bernd Erktag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96132172011-08-25T02:33:03-07:002011-08-25T02:33:03-07:00Allow a filter in "open problems" for "NOT acknowledged AND NOT in downtime" [updated]<p>To much problems in the "open problems" overview, planed downtime is displayed as alarm. I always try to resolve problems until they fit onto the display without scrolling to recognize new problems as fast as possible. Because of that I'm still using Icinga Classic Interface.</p><p>Bernd Erk (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p><a href="https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1614" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://dev.icinga.org/issues/1614</a></p>
<p>Released with Version 1.5</p></div></p>Bernd Erktag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96131872011-08-25T02:31:43-07:002011-08-25T02:31:43-07:00please specifie the requirements for icinga-web better [is now completed]<p>i was just installing icinga-web 1.0.1 at my gentoo system.
After installing i couldn't log in. I wasn't doing anything. After reading a while throught the nagios-portal i figured out that there must be some php modules missing.
After adding hash and ctyp and a few more it worked.
would be great if all requirements could be cheked through "make testdeps". In this case everything would be coverd.
And I also miss the requirements for web browsers. icinga-web works fine with my firefox 3.6.6 but my IE 7 won't show anything!
apart from this I'm very pleased with your work folks.
Thanks a lot!</p>Bernd Erktag:feedback.icinga.org,2008-02-07:Event/96131852011-08-25T02:31:43-07:002011-08-25T02:31:43-07:00please specifie the requirements for icinga-web better [updated]<p>i was just installing icinga-web 1.0.1 at my gentoo system.
After installing i couldn't log in. I wasn't doing anything. After reading a while throught the nagios-portal i figured out that there must be some php modules missing.
After adding hash and ctyp and a few more it worked.
would be great if all requirements could be cheked through "make testdeps". In this case everything would be coverd.
And I also miss the requirements for web browsers. icinga-web works fine with my firefox 3.6.6 but my IE 7 won't show anything!
apart from this I'm very pleased with your work folks.
Thanks a lot!</p><p>Bernd Erk (admin) responded:<br /><div class="typeset"><p>Started to that in the wiki:</p>
<p><a href="https://wiki.icinga.org/display/howtos/Setting+up+icinga-web+1.5.x+-+Quickstart" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://wiki.icinga.org/display/howtos/Setting+up+icinga-web+1.5.x+-+Quickstart</a></p></div></p>Bernd Erk